[Initng] On the future, .i vs .s files.

[Iens Persson]

Moved it to here -> http://enlisy.org/~xerxes2/files/ifile2iscript
And added support for virtuals, env and also_start and fixed a few typos.

Iens Persson wrote:
> Ok, script is (almost) done. I don't know how virtuals works in the 
> new scripts so that's not done yet. Just lemme know and I'll add it.
> http://rafb.net/p/CXBjxk99.html
>
> greets
>
> Ismael Luceno wrote:
>> Iens Persson escribió:
>>  
>>> Good to hear from you Jimmy. Well, if both you and Ismaell thinks 
>>> that initng-scripts is the way to go i guess that's the way it's 
>>> gonna be as you are the main devs. Hopefully those people that seems 
>>> to be a little pissed before will come back when it works smoothly. 
>>> :D And i can write a script that transform .i to .s when the API is 
>>> finished.
>>>     
>>
>> You can consider the API finished, I don't see any need for a change.
>>
>>  
>>> And I sat here thinking before about what was the most important 
>>> things in an initsystem for me and two things stands out:
>>> 1. Dependency checking (fast boot).
>>> 2. Easy to write initscripts.
>>> (Daemon restarting when failure is also nice but I can live without 
>>> it.)
>>> So hopefully it will not get too complicated. I mean, .i files are 
>>> very easy to understand, at least compared to just shellbased ones.
>>>     
>>
>>
>>   
>
>