[Initng] On the future, .i vs .s files.

[Iens Persson]

Ok, script is (almost) done. I don't know how virtuals works in the new 
scripts so that's not done yet. Just lemme know and I'll add it.
http://rafb.net/p/CXBjxk99.html

greets

Ismael Luceno wrote:
> Iens Persson escribió:
>   
>> Good to hear from you Jimmy. Well, if both you and Ismaell thinks that 
>> initng-scripts is the way to go i guess that's the way it's gonna be as 
>> you are the main devs. Hopefully those people that seems to be a little 
>> pissed before will come back when it works smoothly. :D And i can write 
>> a script that transform .i to .s when the API is finished.
>>     
>
> You can consider the API finished, I don't see any need for a change.
>
>   
>> And I sat here thinking before about what was the most important things 
>> in an initsystem for me and two things stands out:
>> 1. Dependency checking (fast boot).
>> 2. Easy to write initscripts.
>> (Daemon restarting when failure is also nice but I can live without it.)
>> So hopefully it will not get too complicated. I mean, .i files are very 
>> easy to understand, at least compared to just shellbased ones.
>>     
>
>
>