[Initng] On the future, .i vs .s files.

[Ismael Luceno]

Iens Persson escribió:
> Good to hear from you Jimmy. Well, if both you and Ismaell thinks that 
> initng-scripts is the way to go i guess that's the way it's gonna be as 
> you are the main devs. Hopefully those people that seems to be a little 
> pissed before will come back when it works smoothly. :D And i can write 
> a script that transform .i to .s when the API is finished.

You can consider the API finished, I don't see any need for a change.

> And I sat here thinking before about what was the most important things 
> in an initsystem for me and two things stands out:
> 1. Dependency checking (fast boot).
> 2. Easy to write initscripts.
> (Daemon restarting when failure is also nice but I can live without it.)
> So hopefully it will not get too complicated. I mean, .i files are very 
> easy to understand, at least compared to just shellbased ones.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://jw.dyndns.org/pipermail/initng/attachments/20070320/aedea7de/attachment.pgp