[Initng] On the future, .i vs .s files.

[Ismael Luceno]

Iens Persson escribió:
> Hello everyone.
> 
> Just wanna ask if we could agree on going forward with initng-scripts or 
> if we should stay with initng-ifiles. I'm happy with either one but I 
> (and probably the rest of the devs and users) need to know how the heck 
> we should do. And about some other things here are my opinions:
> 

We will start working on the .s files after the 0.6.10 release :).

> builtin shell: NO, not ever. This new service_file stuff seems to 
> support all scripting languages and it's hard to support them all in one 
> shell. :P

This will never happen, but we may develop our own super-fast shell
*in a distant future*.

> *inetd functionality: No, not now but may be reconsidered in the future.
> cron functionality: Hmm, not such a bad idea. This one could fit pretty 
> nicely in Initng.

Both may be implemented *after* the 0.7.0 release.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://jw.dyndns.org/pipermail/initng/attachments/20070317/eeda32ab/attachment.pgp