[Initng] An improvement for runiscript
Ismael Luceno
ismael.luceno at gmail.com
Fri Mar 9 04:27:38 CET 2007
Enrico Scholz escribió:
> Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I'm thinking about moving the current code added by runiscript to a
>> wrapper script.
>
> mmh... good performance was formerly a big advantage of initng. I fear
> this will be given up when the initscripts are bloaty bash-scripts
> instead of the small i-files.
>
> The new bash replacement scripts seem to be more complicated and complex
> than the old i-files.
>
> I guess, new goal is to make initng a SysV clone with some new features
> like parallel script execution, right?
>
Well, maybe I should explain my plan...
The ifiles stuff needs a lot of features that make the initng core big,
while with the new service_file format we can move most of the
functionality out of the core, and remove the rest.
Also we will reimplement active_db in a tree-like way, and maybe use
hashes...
That will make the core very fast, and compact.
I hope that after 0.7 we could make our own shell, and maybe we can
implement a cache to make it faster ;).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://jw.dyndns.org/pipermail/initng/attachments/20070309/9adcf2cf/attachment.pgp
More information about the Initng
mailing list